GINGRICH: Cheating the children or empowering the parents

Thousands of teachers and supporters hold signs in the rain during a rally Monday, Jan. 14, 2019, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Ringo H.W. Chiu)

The United States is gradually grinding to an educational collapse as the giant bureaucracies and extraordinarily powerful teachers’ unions ignore children and education in pursuit of power.

Many of the wealthiest school systems have decided that they simply will not go back to school this fall. They will offer virtual classes even though the evidence is overwhelming that for younger children, virtual classes are dramatically less effective than in-person instruction.

For 37 years, children have come last, and the bureaucrats and unions have come first.

Now, we are seeing this anti-student, anti-learning power structure in its full aggressiveness as big, well-funded school systems simply refuse to go back to school.

Notice of course that they are not refusing to accept money. All the teachers and bureaucrats want full pay without having to actually deal with students. They don’t mind sending their so-called instruction through Zoom, Gotomeeting, or some other service (despite the fact most of these systems and teachers have no particular training in the effective use of online learning).

The Chinese Communist Party must love the collapse of American education. Its members know there is no way we can compete with them in a high-tech world if our children can’t go to school. The Chinese virus is paying big dividends for the Chinese Communist dictatorship.

There are also three enormous human costs to the bureaucracy-union stranglehold over education and the refusal to put the children’s interests first:

First, virtually every serious study shows that poor children in impoverished neighborhoods have the greatest need for face-to-face education. They have the least ability to learn by video, and all the reports this spring have reinforced this fact.

Second, children with disabilities especially need real human interaction, in-person sympathy, and a commitment by mentors to help them overcome the challenges they face. Leaving them at home to cope with online learning is simply cruel – and undoes a generation of hard work at helping children with disabilities experience full lives.

Third, there are a host of practical services, especially for low-income students, such as school breakfast and lunch, seeing the school nurse, having a safe place to go while your parents work, and seeing the school guidance counselor that all come from the school system. When these are cut off, the lives of the poorest children become much more difficult.

It is tragically ironic that at the time people are pledging to help overcome racism and seeking to help the African American community, the teachers unions in our biggest cities (where much of our African American community lives) are following a strategy of blackmail and cowardice.

Here are two examples of this unconscionable, despicable blackmail: The Los Angeles Teachers’ Union demands more money through defunding the police and capping charter schools as part of any reopening plan; And the Durham Association of Educators members demand universal health care and welfare for people in the country illegally before they will reopen the schools.

There are three things we can do to return the focus to the children and their education despite the bureaucracy and the teachers’ union:

No. 1: As the US Department of Education has explained, 10% of America’s K-12 students attend non-public schools – this includes millions of students who are from lower- and middle-income families. In Florida alone, 20,000 of these students could lose their scholarships due to the impact of the coronavirus. Any further federal relief must include these families. We should be funding students – not school system bureaucracies.

No. 2: The new recovery bill should include a provision that any school district that refuses to open its schools for in-school learning should lose its federal aid – which would then be converted into a tax credit for the students in that district if their parents want to home school, establish a small community school with others, or go to a private school.

No. 3: The tax cuts in the new recovery bill should include a permanent tax credit for those families who want to provide an education outside the bureaucratic, government-run, unionized system.

If we debated education by putting the students and learning first, these are the kind of policies we would develop in response to bureaucratic, unionized self-centeredness.

Every day we fail to act, our children fall further behind their Chinese counterparts – and our survival as a free country becomes a little more endangered.

Every day we fail to act, poor children are further trapped in a self-serving bureaucratic cycle and are further kept from a prosperous future.

If teachers don’t want to teach our children, we should fire them and hire ones who will.

To read, hear, and watch more of Newt’s commentary, visit