How odd was it that in the same week Nike introduced its “Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything” #JustDoIt campaign, the vaunted New York Times would publish an anonymous op-ed piece about the Trump White House by someone who felt so strongly about its dysfunction … they didn’t sign their name to it.
Does this person not feel strongly enough about the dangers of the Trump White House to sacrifice their own job?
Nike probably won’t sponsor this person. Or will they in absentia?
Is this person old enough to remember the heroism of AG Elliot Richardson and Deputy AG William Ruckelshaus when they resigned instead of bowing to the pressure of President Richard Nixon in 1973 after he demanded they fire Archibald Cox, the special prosecutor investigating Watergate?
Does this person remember that John Hancock signed the Declaration of Independence with 55 other delegates? Benjamin Franklin is attributed as saying after affixing his signature: “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”
Had the founders stayed “anonymous” maybe they could have avoided the gallows noose had they lost The War.
The publication of the anonymous op-ed piece in The New York Times by a “senior Trump Administration official” last week has broken new ground in the annals of journalism.
Who in their right mind would ever publish such an anonymous document? How do we know it is even a “real” person who wrote it? What if some junior staff person at CNN drafted it and submitted it to The New York Times editorial board ,and they published it because they hate President Trump so much that they will do anything to take him down?
After all we have seen in traditional and social media lately, are we 100 percent sure this is not some planted hit piece purely for political purposes?
At the beginning of the republic, there were hundreds if not thousands of small newspapers around the 13 colonies. Hardly any of them pretended to be totally objective, totally nonpartisan journalistic news outlets.
The more partisan they were, the better were sales of their newspapers. The more incendiary their attacks against the Federalists in power or the Democratic-Republicans who followed later, the more papers they sold to the people who agreed with their point of view.
James Callender was a master of disaster when it came to publishing horrible and totally bogus claims against political opponents of his friends James Madison and Thomas Jefferson. Most of the time, Messrs. Madison and Jefferson funneled the information they wanted Mr. Callender to publish in the first place.
The factual news was secondary to the spreading of their side of the story and their preferred points of political philosophy as it pertained to the new government.
Have we gone back to the future where the venerated Grey Lady of American journalism that has operated under the banner “All The News That’s Fit To Print’ for a century has descended into being a mere propaganda arm of the left-wing progressive movement and “The Resistance To President Trump”?
Here’s our policy at the North State Journal: If you are not brave enough to sign your name to an opinion piece, we will not publish it.
We know that publishing such anonymous op-eds is wrong. It is dead wrong for the country, our body politic and for American journalism.
Men and women of integrity in American politics over time have risen above such cowardly behavior and either challenged powers-that-be publicly and face-to-face or, as we saw in the case of Nixon’s Watergate fiasco, resigned rather than serve under corrupt leadership.
We wish more men and women of integrity on both sides of the aisle would stand up for what is right.