Regarding the June 21 article, “SCOTUS strikes NC ban on sex offenders using social media,” in which the Supreme Court of the United States struck down the 2008 N.C. law banning convicted sex offenders from using certain social media outlets.I believe that convicted sex offenders should be banned from using social media sites for personal use, but could use them for career opportunities such as the site LinkedIn. If they were to use social media for personal interactions, I believe it would be too tempting to hide behind the veil of the Internet and could present a risk to unknowing victims. However, trying to legislate who uses which sites for which reasons seems very complicated.The North Carolina General Assembly was clearly trying to do the right thing for its citizens, however, for those persons who may have been rehabilitated from the crime of sexual offenses against children, this law may have gone too far.As a teenager who uses multiple social media sites for every day interactions with my friends, the idea that a convicted sex offender could be lurking to make contact with my friends and me is very concerning. It’s a complex issue with a no-size-fits-all approach.Ben BurrisRaleigh
Related Articles
BARONE: Cultural appropriation A modest proposal
“Cultural appropriation” has become the latest evil denounced by soi-disant social justice warriors, on campus and off. Examples: “I was taught that white people shouldn’t listen to rap music because it’s cultural appropriation and could […]
GREENBERG: Beyond belief
“War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.” George Orwell, “1984” Nothing changes except the date on the calendar, as an old buddy of ours used to say. For how many times by […]
ELLIOT: The devious child care tax credit
A line item in Gov. Roy Cooper’s budget proposal spends about $52 million on a restored Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit, a feature that was eliminated in North Carolina as part of a 2013 […]