U.S. House follows Senate voting to begin repealing Obamacare

YURI GRIPAS—Reuters
U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) (C) walks to the House Chamber to vote on Obamacare repeal

WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. House Republicans on Friday won passage of a measure starting the process of dismantling Obamacare. The House voted 227-198 to instruct committees to draft legislation by a target date of Jan. 27 that would repeal the 2010 Affordable Health Care Act, often called Obamacare. The Senate approved the same measure early Thursday, with N.C.’s Senators Tillis and Burr voting in favor of the measure.N.C.’s U.S. House delegation voting in favor of the measure includes Republican Representatives Richard Hudson, Mark Meadows, Robert Pittenger, Mark Walker, David Rouzer, Ted Budd, George Holding, Patrick McHenry and Virginia Foxx. N.C. Republican Walter Jones voted against the measure. All Democrats in the House voted against it as well.”I recognize repealing Obamacare could be divisive, but why can’t the replacement be bipartisan?” said Rep. Hudson (R-N.C.) in a statement after the vote. “We’re going to do this in an open, thoughtful and transparent way — with input from both sides of the aisle, from doctors and patients, from insurance companies and businesses, and most importantly, from the American people. I look forward to working with my colleagues and the Trump administration to implement patient-centered, market-based reforms that expand access to quality health care and actually lower costs for all.” With this vote, Republicans began delivering on their promise to end Obamacare, which also was a campaign promise of President-elect Donald Trump. The program, which expanded health coverage to some 20 million people, has been plagued by increases in insurance premiums and deductibles and by some large insurers leaving the system. The resolution passed by the House and Senate does not need presidential approval, since it is part of an internal congressional budget process. But once the Obamacare repeal legislation is drafted, both chambers will need to approve it, and a presidential signature will be required. By that time, Trump will have been sworn in as president and he has urged Congress to act quickly to repeal and replace the Democratic program. Obamacare was enacted nearly seven years ago – over Republican objections – in an effort to expand coverage and give new protections for people with pre-existing health conditions and other barriers that left them without insurance. In the past few years, the House has voted more than 60 times to repeal or alter Obamacare but Republicans had no hope a repeal would become law as long as Obama was president. House Speaker Paul Ryan, a Republican, said Obamacare was collapsing and action was urgent. For people who have health insurance through the Obamacare system, he said, “The deductibles are so high it doesn’t feel like you’ve got insurance in the first place. “We have to step in before things get worse. This is nothing short of a rescue mission,” Ryan said. Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi rebutted Republicans’ claims that the law was a failure. “The rate of growth in healthcare costs in our country has been greatly diminished by the Affordable Care Act,” she said. “In the more than 50 years that they have been measuring the rate of growth, it has never been slower than now.” The choice before lawmakers, she said, is “affordable care versus chaos.” Trump applauded Congress’ efforts with a Friday morning tweet saying, “The ‘Unaffordable’ Care Act will soon be history!” The president-elect, who takes office on Jan. 20, pressed lawmakers this week to repeal and replace it “essentially simultaneously.” Republican leaders would like to finish the repeal process within weeks but some lawmakers think it could take far longer. Some Republicans have expressed concern about starting a repeal before agreeing on how to replace provisions of the complicated and far-reaching law. The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated repealing Obama’s signature health insurance law entirely would cost roughly $350 billion over 10 years. Republicans say a good replacement would give states more control of a healthcare program and provide more stability on health insurance premiums.